Current:Home > InvestPolice defend decision not to disclose accidental gunshot during Columbia protest response -Infinite Edge Learning
Police defend decision not to disclose accidental gunshot during Columbia protest response
View
Date:2025-04-13 15:37:22
NEW YORK (AP) — New York City police officials on Friday defended their decision to initially keep quiet about a potentially dangerous accident that happened as officers cleared pro-Palestinian protesters from Columbia University this week when a sergeant accidentally fired his gun into a dark office.
The bullet, discharged as the officer transferred his gun to his left hand while trying to get into the locked room, crashed through a glass panel in a door and landed harmlessly on the floor. The office was vacant, so nobody was hit, police officials said at a news conference Friday.
Neither the city’s mayor, Eric Adams, nor any other official mentioned the accidental gunshot in news conferences or media interviews held since police cleared protesters from Columbia’s Hamilton Hall on Tuesday.
The department’s chief spokesperson, Deputy Commissioner of Public Information Tarik Sheppard, said Friday that he didn’t think it was particularly newsworthy because officers accidentally fire their guns about eight times a year and it rarely gets much attention.
“My goal here was not to just try and make a story,” Sheppard said. “I knew it would come up eventually because it always does. So there was no rush for us to talk about this.”
Asked whether the department would release body camera footage of the incident, Sheppard said no. The department has selectively released some body camera footage and video taken by department officials during the operation to clear protesters from the Columbia building, but requests for unedited footage have been refused.
The accidental discharge remained unknown to the public until it was reported by the news site The City on Thursday. The Manhattan district attorney’s office is investigating the incident, a spokesperson said.
The sergeant, who was not identified, was carrying a gun with flashlight attached as he and other officers searched Hamilton Hall for anyone who might be hiding, Assistant Chief Carlos Valdez, head of the NYPD emergency service unit, said at Friday’s news conference.
“During the course of this operation, while clearing an unoccupied vacant area of the building on the first floor, one ESU member, a sergeant, did unintentionally discharge one round from his firearm,” Valdez said.
Valdez said the accidental discharge occurred after police broke the glass panel of a locked office door in order to get inside the office and make sure no one was inside. The gun went off as the sergeant switched it from his right hand to his left hand in order to reach in through the broken window and unlock the door with his right hand, Valdez said.
The bullet landed on the floor of the office and struck no one, he said.
The following day, Adams, a Democrat and former police officer, praised the operation to clear Hamilton Hall, a site of protests and occupations since 1968.
“Just a tremendous job done by the men and women of the NYPD,” the mayor said at a briefing on Wednesday. “Such restraint, such precision.”
No mention was made of the unintentional gunshot.
Police in New York City do not generally inform the public about accidental gunshots unless a person is struck by gunfire.
Asked Friday why police had not informed the public about the Hamilton Hall incident, Sheppard said, “I didn’t make the decision that we wanted to address the accidental discharge at that time because we normally don’t address them.”
veryGood! (628)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- A critically endangered Sumatran rhino named Delilah successfully gives birth in Indonesia
- Arrest made after 3 Palestinian college students shot in Burlington, Vermont, police say
- Jean Knight, Grammy-nominated singer of 'Mr. Big Stuff,' dies at 80: 'Iconic soulstress'
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Eagles troll Kansas City Chiefs with Taylor Swift reference after big win
- Teyana Taylor Addresses Quietly Filing for Divorce From Iman Shumpert
- Hiam Abbass’ Palestinian family documentary ‘Bye Bye Tiberias’ applauded at Marrakech Film Festival
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Fighting the good fight against ALS
Ranking
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- 32 things we learned in NFL Week 12: Playoff chase shaping up to be wild
- Assailants in latest ship attack near Yemen were likely Somali, not Houthi rebels, Pentagon says
- Pope Francis getting antibiotics intravenously for lung problem, limiting appointments, Vatican says
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Delaware County’s top prosecutor becomes fifth Democrat to run for Pennsylvania attorney general
- Tiger Woods makes comeback at 2023 Hero World Challenge in the Bahamas
- U.S. airlines lose 2 million suitcases a year. Where do they end up?
Recommendation
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
Amazon is using AI to deliver packages faster than ever this holiday season
Before dying, she made a fund to cancel others' medical debt — nearly $70m worth
Russian FM says he plans to attend OSCE meeting in North Macedonia
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Tiger Woods makes comeback at 2023 Hero World Challenge in the Bahamas
Is it better to take Social Security at 62 or 67? It depends.
French labor minister goes on trial for alleged favoritism when he was a mayor