Current:Home > MyNorth Carolina governor vetoes masks bill largely due to provision about campaign finance -Infinite Edge Learning
North Carolina governor vetoes masks bill largely due to provision about campaign finance
Chainkeen Exchange View
Date:2025-04-06 23:56:20
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Despite changes made to North Carolina’s masking bill to quell concerns over the removal of a pandemic-era health exemption, Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper said he vetoed the legislation on Friday mostly for a different reason: a campaign finance provision tacked on to the end during legislative negotiations.
The bill now heads back to the state legislature. Republicans hold narrow veto-proof majorities at the General Assembly, which overrode all 19 of Cooper’s vetoes last year.
It’s Cooper’s third veto of the year, and GOP lawmakers have yet to take up override votes on his previous two this session — although they may come soon.
The original bill version that passed through the state Senate prompted significant criticism over its removal of an exemption to public masking laws passed in 2020 that allowed people to wear a mask for health purposes. The exemption’s removal would have technically made masking for health reasons illegal in the state.
While the strikethrough of one line caught most people’s attention, the majority of the bill focuses on increasing penalties for people who wear masks while committing a crime or intentionally block roadways in demonstrations. Republican legislators advanced the legislation this session in part as a response to the use of masks during widespread campus protests over the war in Gaza, including demonstrations on the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina.
The bill’s relatively smooth passage through the Senate stopped when it reached the state House, however, when Republican Rep. Erin Pare announced on X she wouldn’t vote for the bill without a health exemption. Because Republicans need every GOP vote to pass more polarizing legislation, the bill was sent to a committee of legislators to work out a compromise.
They reached a deal on the bill earlier this month, which notably added a health exemption for people who wear a “medical or surgical grade mask” to prevent the spread of disease. Law enforcement and property owners would also be allowed to ask someone to temporarily remove their mask to identify them under the new bill changes.
But another brand-new provision that caused outrage among Democratic legislators was the addition of a campaign donations clause that would allow wealthy donors to give money to special federal political organizations that can then send the money to state and county parties.
Cooper said in his veto statement that the legislation “created a gaping loophole for secret, unlimited campaign money” that could cause problems during an election year. He also said the legislation still does not fully protect people who wear masks for health reasons.
One of the bill’s sponsors, Robeson County Republican Sen. Danny Britt, said in a statement that Cooper’s veto encourages “bad actors” to wear masks to conceal their identity and not face consequences.
Republicans have also defended the election finance addition as necessary to remedy problems with a 2020 State Board of Elections advisory opinion that affirmed campaign giving limits but hamstrung groups like the Republican Governors Association from aiding the state party.
Senate Democrats refused to vote on the bill due to the provision, and House Democrats expounded upon their worries that the legislation would create a lack of financial transparency in lengthy debate last week.
The House and Senate expect to take up their veto overrides next week before they go on a possible indefinite hiatus to resolve budget issues.
veryGood! (487)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Carbon Capture Takes Center Stage, But Is Its Promise an Illusion?
- The EPA proposes tighter limits on toxic emissions from coal-fired power plants
- The Fed's radical new bank band-aid
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Peter Thomas Roth Deal: Get 2 Rose Stem Cell Masks for the Price of 1
- Honoring Bruce Lee
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, July 23, 2023
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- How a Successful EPA Effort to Reduce Climate-Warming ‘Immortal’ Chemicals Stalled
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Fox News settles blockbuster defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems
- Louisville appoints Jacquelyn Gwinn-Villaroel as first Black woman to lead its police department
- As States Move to Electrify Their Fleets, Activists Demand Greater Environmental Justice Focus
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- A Florida Chemical Plant Has Fallen Behind in Its Pledge to Cut Emissions of a Potent Greenhouse Gas
- Chipotle and Sweetgreen's short-lived beef over a chicken burrito bowl gets resolved
- ‘Stripped of Everything,’ Survivors of Colorado’s Most Destructive Fire Face Slow Recoveries and a Growing Climate Threat
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Frustrated airline travelers contend with summer season of flight disruptions
Nature’s Say: How Voices from Hawai’i Are Reframing the Climate Conversation
45 Lululemon Finds I Predict Will Sell Out 4th of July Weekend: Don’t Miss These Buys Starting at $9
Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
Nikki Reed Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Ian Somerhalder
Ron DeSantis threatens Anheuser-Busch over Bud Light marketing campaign with Dylan Mulvaney
State Tensions Rise As Water Cuts Deepen On The Colorado River