Current:Home > InvestJury in NFL "Sunday Ticket" case rules league violated antitrust laws, awards nearly $4.8 billion in damages -Infinite Edge Learning
Jury in NFL "Sunday Ticket" case rules league violated antitrust laws, awards nearly $4.8 billion in damages
View
Date:2025-04-14 03:05:53
A jury in U.S. District Court ordered the NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in damages Thursday after ruling that the league violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.
The jury awarded $4.7 billion in damages to the residential class and $96 million in damages to the commercial class.
The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses who paid for the package of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons on DirecTV. The lawsuit claimed the league broke antitrust laws by selling its package of Sunday games at an inflated price. The subscribers also say the league restricted competition by offering "Sunday Ticket" only on a satellite provider.
The NFL said it would appeal the verdict. That appeal would go to the 9th Circuit and then possibly the Supreme Court.
"We are disappointed with the jury's verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit," the league said in a statement. "We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.
"We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit."
The jury of five men and three women deliberated for nearly five hours before reaching its decision.
"This case transcends football. This case matters," plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said during Wednesday's closing arguments. "It's about justice. It's about telling the 32 team owners who collectively own all the big TV rights, the most popular content in the history of TV - that's what they have. It's about telling them that even you cannot ignore the antitrust laws. Even you cannot collude to overcharge consumers. Even you can't hide the truth and think you're going to get away with it."
The league maintained it has the right to sell "Sunday Ticket" under its antitrust exemption for broadcasting. The plaintiffs say that only covers over-the-air broadcasts and not pay TV.
DirecTV had "Sunday Ticket" from its inception in 1994 through 2022. The league signed a seven-year deal with Google's YouTube TV that began with the 2023 season.
The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. Gutierrez ruled last year the case could proceed as a class action.
- In:
- NFL
veryGood! (78)
Related
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Summer School 1: Planet Money goes to business school
- Puerto Rico Hands Control of its Power Plants to a Natural Gas Company
- Jimmy Carter Signed 14 Major Environmental Bills and Foresaw the Threat of Climate Change
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Twitter replaces its bird logo with an X as part of Elon Musk's plan for a super app
- Study: Higher Concentrations Of Arsenic, Uranium In Drinking Water In Black, Latino, Indigenous Communities
- Why can't Canada just put the fires out? Here are 5 answers to key questions
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Three Midwestern States to Watch as They Navigate Equitable Rollout for EV Charging
Ranking
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Texas Oilfield Waste Company Contributed $53,750 to Regulators Overseeing a Controversial Permit Application
- Here's what happens to the body in extreme temperatures — and how heat becomes deadly
- AMC Theaters reverses its decision to price tickets based on where customers sit
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Rooftop Solar Is Becoming More Accessible to People with Lower Incomes, But Not Fast Enough
- Texas Oilfield Waste Company Contributed $53,750 to Regulators Overseeing a Controversial Permit Application
- Colleen Ballinger's Remaining Miranda Sings Tour Dates Canceled Amid Controversy
Recommendation
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
Sea Level Rise Could Drive 1 in 10 People from Their Homes, with Dangerous Implications for International Peace, UN Secretary General Warns
Up First briefing: Climate-conscious buildings; Texas abortion bans; GMO mosquitoes
As the Climate Changes, Climate Fiction Is Changing With It
Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
In the End, Solar Power Opponents Prevail in Williamsport, Ohio
Kyle Richards Claps Back at “Damage Control” Claim After Sharing Family Photo With Mauricio Umansky
A New Push Is on in Chicago to Connect Urban Farmers With Institutional Buyers Like Schools and Hospitals