Current:Home > reviewsNorth Carolina lawmakers appeal judge’s decision blocking abortion-pill restrictions -Infinite Edge Learning
North Carolina lawmakers appeal judge’s decision blocking abortion-pill restrictions
View
Date:2025-04-16 08:21:34
GREENSBORO, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina Republican legislative leaders are appealing portions of a federal judge’s order this month that blocked several state laws that restrict how abortion pills can be dispensed, including the requirement that only physicians can provide the drugs to patients.
Lawyers for Senate leader Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore filed a notice Thursday to seek a review by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia.
U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles declared June 3 that the provisions were preempted by federal law and that prosecutors and health and medical officials, among others, couldn’t enforce them. Eagles declared that the provisions were in conflict with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s authority given by Congress to ensure the safe use and distribution of higher-risk drugs.
In addition to the physician-only requirement, Eagles also halted state laws requiring the pills only to be provided in person, the patient schedule a follow-up appointment and the reporting to the FDA of non-fatal “adverse events” related to the use of mifepristone. It is used to end pregnancy in combination with a second drug.
Eagles’ ruling opened the door for patients in North Carolina to receive the pills through pharmacies — prescribed through someone like a nurse practitioner or physician assistant or using telehealth — and take them at home, in keeping with FDA decisions.
But Eagles allowed other provisions in state law to remain enforceable, saying they had either not been expressly reviewed and rejected by the FDA, or focus more on the practice of medicine or on general patient health. They include requiring in-person consultation 72 hours in advance, an in-person examination and an ultrasound before obtaining a prescription. Republicans are not challenging Eagles’ decisions on these matters.
veryGood! (2498)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- 'Hot Dog' wins Caldecott, Newbery is awarded to 'Freewater'
- 5 YA books this winter dealing with identity and overcoming hardships
- 'All the Beauty in the World' conveys Met guard's profound appreciation for art
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- 2023 Oscars Guide: Documentary Feature
- What's making us happy: A guide to your weekend reading, listening and viewing
- Middle age 'is a force you cannot fight,' warns 'Fleishman Is in Trouble' author
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- The 2022 Oscars' best original song nominees, cruelly ranked
Ranking
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- 2023 Oscars Guide: Original Song
- R. Kelly sentenced to one more year in prison for child pornography
- See all the red carpet looks from the 2023 Oscars
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Senegal's artists are fighting the system with a mic and spray paint
- The 2022 Oscars' best original song nominees, cruelly ranked
- 'Hot Dog' wins Caldecott, Newbery is awarded to 'Freewater'
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
The Economics of the Grammys, Explained
Comic: How audiobooks enable the shared experience of listening to a good story
LBJ biographer Robert Caro reflects on fame, power and the presidency
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
'Hijab Butch Blues' challenges stereotypes and upholds activist self-care
'Magic Mike's Last Dance': I see London, I see pants
Adults complained about a teen theater production and the show's creators stepped in