Current:Home > StocksRekubit-Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Infinite Edge Learning
Rekubit-Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
TradeEdge View
Date:2025-04-09 04:30:35
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington,Rekubit D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (72332)
Related
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Sean Diddy Combs Arrested in New York
- Their relatives died after a Baltimore bridge collapsed. Here's who they blame
- Haunting last message: 'All good here.' Coast Guard's Titan submersible hearing begins
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Democrats run unopposed to fill 2 state House vacancies in Philadelphia
- Yes, mangoes are good for you. But here's why you don't want to eat too many.
- San Francisco 49ers WR Deebo Samuel to miss a couple weeks with calf injury
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- The new hard-right Dutch coalition pledges stricter limits on asylum
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- Kamala Harris’ silk press shines: The conversation her hair is starting about Black women in politics
- What is the best used SUV to buy? Consult this list of models under $10,000
- Why Josh Gad Regrets Using His Voice for Frozen's Olaf
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Oregon man charged with stalking, harassing UConn's Paige Bueckers
- 'He didn't blink': Kirk Cousins defies doubters to lead Falcons' wild comeback win vs. Eagles
- Tate Ratledge injury update: Georgia OL reportedly expected to be out several weeks
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
'Golden Bachelorette' Joan Vassos ready to find TV prince: 'You have to kiss some frogs'
90 Day Fiancé’s Big Ed Brown Engaged to Porscha Raemond 24 Hours After Meeting at Fan Event
Stanley Cup champion Panthers agree to extend arena deal with Broward County through at least 2033
Travis Hunter, the 2
Review: 'High Potential' could be your next 'Castle'-like obsession
Major companies abandon an LGBTQ+ rights report card after facing anti-diversity backlash
Natasha Rothwell knows this one necessity is 'bizarre': 'It's a bit of an oral fixation'