Current:Home > ScamsNew labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why. -Infinite Edge Learning
New labor rule could be a big deal for millions of franchise and contract workers. Here's why.
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 05:10:32
Millions of workers at some of the biggest U.S. employers could gain sweeping new rights under a new federal labor rule set to take effect by year-end.
The final rule, announced Thursday by the National Labor Relations Board, would classify companies such as franchisees and contractors as an employer if they control basic conditions of work such as pay, scheduling and supervision. In a stroke, that would make fast-food giants, retailers, technology players, staffing firms and many other businesses that hire workers on a contract basis more accountable for violations of labor law, one expert told CBS MoneyWatch.
"The new rule is enormously important and could bolster the rights of millions of employees," John Logan, chair of labor and employment studies at San Francisco State University, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The so-called joint employer rule replaces one enacted during the Trump administration that required companies to have "direct and immediate" control over contract and franchise workers to be considered joint employers. Labor advocates contend the present standard gave companies an escape route for violations of labor law.
"Under the previous standard, it was too easy for corporations to claim they weren't responsible for violations of workers' rights and almost impossible to hold accountable," Logan said.
Companies that are classified as joint employers under the new rule could now be made to take part in collective bargaining, for instance.
Industry pushback
NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran said the board took "a legally correct return to common-law principles" in crafting the rule, which takes effect on December 26.
The regulation is opposed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Retail Association (NRA), with both indicating that they could challenge the rule in court.
"It defies common sense to say that businesses can be held liable for workers they don't employ at workplaces they don't own or control, yet that is exactly what the new NLRB joint-employer rule does," Glenn Spencer, the group's senior vice president for the employment division, said in a statement. "This rule will create chaos and more legal confusion that will harm both employers and workers. The U.S. Chamber will carefully evaluate our options going forward, including litigation."
The NRA reiterated its opposition to the new standard, calling it "unclear, unnecessary and harmful to thousands of retail employers and the millions of Americans they employ."
American Hotel & Lodging Association President & CEO Chip Rogers called the LNRB's new rule "devastating to the hotel industry and the millions of people we employ," and accused the agency of trying to dismantle the franchise business model to "artificially increase unionization."
Sens. Joe Manchin, D.-W. Va. and Bill Cassidy, R.-La., say they'll introduce a resolution to overturn the rule, Politico reported.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- As New York’s Gas Infrastructure Ages, Some Residents Are Left With Leaking Pipes or No Gas at All
- All the Tragedy That Has Led to Belief in a Kennedy Family Curse
- Can Iceberg Surges in the Arctic Trigger Rapid Warming at the Other End of The World?
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Cleveland’s Tree Canopy Is in Trouble
- Federal Money Begins Flowing to Lake Erie for Projects With an Eye on Future Climate Impacts
- It’s the Features, Stupid: EV Market Share Is Growing Because the Vehicles Keep Getting Better
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- The Solar Industry Gained Jobs Last Year. But Are Those Good Jobs, and Could They Be Better?
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Nick Jonas and Priyanka Chopra's Cutest Family Pics With Daughter Malti
- Students and Faculty at Ohio State Respond to a Bill That Would Restrict College Discussions of Climate Policies
- Fossil Fuel Companies Should Pay Trillions in ‘Climate Reparations,’ New Study Argues
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- An Ohio College Town Wants to Lead on Fighting Climate Change. It Also Has a 1940s-Era, Diesel-Burning Power Plant
- Why Julie Bowen Is Praising Single Modern Family Co-Star Sofia Vergara After Joe Manganiello Split
- Love is Blind's Lauren Speed-Hamilton Reveals If She and Husband Cameron Would Ever Return To TV
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Here's the Reason Why Goldie Hawn Never Married Longtime Love Kurt Russell
Arizona Announces Phoenix Area Can’t Grow Further on Groundwater
The Financial Sector Is Failing to Estimate Climate Risk, Say Two Groups in the UK
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
Ariana Grande Gives Glimpse Into Life in London After Dalton Gomez Breakup
European Union Approves Ambitious Nature Restoration Law
Miranda Lambert Stops Las Vegas Concert to Call Out Fans for Taking Selfies
Tags
Like
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Log and Burn, or Leave Alone? Indiana Residents Fight US Forest Service Over the Future of Hoosier National Forest
- Pennsylvania Expects $400 Million in Infrastructure Funds to Begin Plugging Thousands of Abandoned Oil Wells