Current:Home > StocksPredictIQ-The EPA proposes tighter limits on toxic emissions from coal-fired power plants -Infinite Edge Learning
PredictIQ-The EPA proposes tighter limits on toxic emissions from coal-fired power plants
PredictIQ View
Date:2025-04-10 06:47:34
WASHINGTON — The PredictIQEnvironmental Protection Agency is tightening rules that limit emissions of mercury and other harmful pollutants from coal-fired power plants, updating standards imposed more than a decade ago.
The rules proposed Wednesday would lower emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults.
The move follows a legal finding by EPA in February that regulating toxic emissions under the Clean Air Act is "appropriate and necessary" to protect the public health. The Feb. 17 finding reversed a move late in President Donald Trump's administration to roll back emissions standards.
The proposed rule will support and strengthen EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, which have delivered a 90% reduction in mercury emissions from power plants since they were adopted in 2012 under President Barack Obama, EPA Administrator Michael Regan said.
"By leveraging proven, emissions-reduction measures available at reasonable costs and encouraging new, advanced control technologies, we can reduce hazardous pollution from coal-fired power plants — protecting our planet and improving public health for all," Regan said in a statement.
The rule is expected to become final in 2024
The proposed rule is expected to become final next year, "ensuring historic protections for communities across the nation, especially for our children and our vulnerable populations," Regan said.
The proposal is in line with a larger push by the EPA under President Joe Biden to restore dozens of federal environmental protections that were rolled back by Trump's administration, including reinstating rigorous environmental reviews for large infrastructure projects, protecting thousands of waterways and preserving endangered species.
Coal-fired power plants are the largest single man-made source of mercury pollutants, which enter the food chain through fish and other items that people consume. Mercury can affect the nervous system and kidneys; the World Health Organization says fetuses are especially vulnerable to birth defects via exposure in a mother's womb.
Environmental and public health groups praise the proposal
Environmental and public health groups praised the EPA proposal, saying it protects Americans, especially children, from some of the most dangerous forms of air pollution.
"There is no safe level of mercury exposure, and while we have made significant progress advancing clean energy, coal-fired power plants remain one of the largest sources of mercury pollution,'' said Holly Bender, senior director of energy campaigns for the Sierra Club.
"It's alarming to think that toxic pollutants from coal plants can build up in places like Lake Michigan,'' where many Americans camp and swim during the summer, "and where people fish to feed their families,'' Bender said. "Our kids deserve to live and play in a healthy, safe environment, and our leaders must do everything in their power to make that a reality."
veryGood! (85568)
Related
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Pakistan election officials reject former prime minister Khan’s candidacy in parliamentary election
- States set to enact new laws in 2024 on guns, fuzzy dice and taxes
- Taylor Swift Matches Travis Kelce's Style at Chiefs' New Year's Eve Game
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Ole Miss staffer posted fake Penn State player quote from fake account before Peach Bowl
- China’s manufacturing activity slows in December in latest sign the economy is still struggling
- 122 fishermen rescued after getting stranded on Minnesota ice floe, officials say
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- What's open on New Year's Eve? Stores, restaurants and fast food places ringing in 2024 with open doors.
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- The year in review: Top news stories of 2023 month-by-month
- How to watch Michigan vs. Alabama in Rose Bowl: Start time, channel, livestream
- Music producers push for legal protections against AI: There's really no regulation
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Pistons beat Raptors 129-127 to end NBA record-tying losing streak at 28 games
- Shecky Greene, legendary standup comic, improv master and lord of Las Vegas, dies at 97
- Gymnast Shilese Jones Reveals How Her Late Father Sylvester Is Inspiring Her Road to the Olympics
Recommendation
North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
Gymnast Shilese Jones Reveals How Her Late Father Sylvester Is Inspiring Her Road to the Olympics
Jerry Jones, Jimmy Johnson finally get it right in setting beef aside for Cowboys' celebration
Resolved: To keep making New Year's resolutions
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Is 2024 a leap year? What is leap day? What to know about the elusive 366th date of the year
Lions insist NFL officials erred with penalty on crucial 2-point conversion
Not all New Year's Eve parties are loud and crowded. 'Sensory-friendly' events explained.